Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
No financial interests declared.
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI's activity for your organisation
Lex monitors MEP activity, lobby meetings, and legislative files — and tells your team exactly what to do about it.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register — last 6 months
About Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI
Kosma Złotowski is a Polish Member of the European Parliament representing the Law and Justice party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość), Poland's conservative ruling party that has frequently clashed with EU institutions over rule of law issues. He sits with the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group, a right-wing Eurosceptic political grouping that advocates for national sovereignty, traditional values, and reforming rather than deepening European integration. Złotowski demonstrates exceptional commitment to his parliamentary duties, maintaining a 99% attendance record compared to the European Parliament's average of approximately 82%, and has participated in 1,854 of 1,873 votes (99% participation rate). Before entering European politics, Złotowski served in various roles within Polish administration and the Law and Justice party structure. His presence in the European Parliament reflects Poland's complex relationship with EU governance, where Law and Justice MEPs often advocate for Polish national interests while challenging what they view as excessive EU centralization and interference in member state affairs.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Poland
More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.