Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
MEP ProComputed from Jens GIESEKE’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes · how this works →
Predicted stance by topic
2025 Commission report on Georgia
2026-06-17
99% of 156 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 17 foreign votes · voted For in 75% of the last 20 cast votes
Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire
2026-02-12
95% of 119 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 5 defence votes · voted For in 75% of the last 20 cast votes
Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania
2026-01-22
99% of 151 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 10 rule of law votes · voted For in 75% of the last 20 cast votes
Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies
2026-01-20
84% of 164 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 9 employment votes · voted For in 75% of the last 20 cast votes
Files Jens leads
Dossiers where Jens GIESEKE is the rapporteur, the Member who steers the report through committee. Source: European Parliament Open Data.
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the…
A10-0010/2024 · Rapporteur
REPORT on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on passenger rights in the context of multimodal journeys
A10-0120/2025 · Rapporteur
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of…
A10-0158/2025 · Rapporteur
Voted for on this file · 18 Jun 2026
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€500–550/year
Based on declared income bands
1 declared activity
3 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Jens GIESEKE's activity for your organisation
WheresMyMEP Pro sends you their new votes the day they land, predicts the ones they miss, and keeps your whole MEP list in one place.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
New meetings for Jens GIESEKE appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Jens GIESEKE
Jens Gieseke represents Germany in the European Parliament as a member of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Germany's main centre-right party that has traditionally dominated the country's political landscape. He sits with the European People's Party (EPP), the Parliament's largest political group, which advocates for pro-European policies while emphasizing market economics, Christian democratic values, and conservative social positions. His consistent presence in parliamentary proceedings reflects a dedicated approach to his legislative responsibilities. As a German MEP within the EPP framework, Gieseke operates within the context of European center-right politics, contributing to policy debates and decision-making processes that shape European Union legislation and direction across various policy areas.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Germany
More MEPs in European People’s Party (EPP)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.