Attendance by month
EP · roll-call · last 180 daysCredited roll-call participation in each calendar month of the current 180-day window of the 10th term, from the same per-sitting counts as the headline figure. Officially excused sittings (Rule 162) are removed from that month's denominator — a gap in the line is a fully excused month. The dashed line is the mean of ranked MEPs' monthly rates. How this is calculated
Missed votes by sitting
EP · attendance register · last 180 daysEvery plenary sitting day on which this MEP missed at least one roll-call vote, newest first. “Officially excused” means the Parliament's own record excuses the absence; those sittings are already credited in the figure above. Links open the Parliament's record for that day. How this works
- Wed, 16 Sept 2026Missed 2 of 80 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 14 Sept 2026Missed the 1 voteNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 7 Jul 2026Missed 1 of 72 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 18 Jun 2026Missed all 77 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 17 Jun 2026Missed 1 of 127 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 18 May 2026Missed 1 of 4 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 29 Apr 2026Missed 1 of 296 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
Voting Record
Main votes over the last 180 days · data as of 6 Oct 2026
Voting against the party line
Share of recorded plenary roll-call votes where Tobias CREMER voted differently from the majority of their European Parliament political group, or of their national-party colleagues.
Different from S&D majority
3.2% (6 of 185)
The S&D average on the same method is 4.3%. Counted only when Tobias CREMER cast For, Against or Abstain and the group had a unique leading position.
Different from national-party majority
1.6% (3 of 184)
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (Social Democratic Party of Germany) · 14 sitting MEPs. Singleton delegations are excluded.
Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
Tobias CREMER voted For; 92% of voting S&D members (114 of 124) voted Against.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins
Tobias CREMER voted Abstain; 81% of voting S&D members (98 of 121) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed
Tobias CREMER voted For; 73% of voting S&D members (90 of 124) voted Against.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
Tobias CREMER voted Against; 66% of voting S&D members (71 of 107) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
Tobias CREMER voted Against; 66% of voting S&D members (73 of 111) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse
Tobias CREMER voted Abstain; 65% of voting S&D members (80 of 124) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Source: HowTheyVote.eu export of European Parliament roll-call results. This is a count of recorded positions, not a judgment of motive. How this is calculated · Who breaks with their group most often
Vote predictions
Vote modelComputed from Tobias CREMER’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
87% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes
Coming up in plenary, early prediction
Motions for resolutions - The state of play of advancing EU-Africa trade and investment relations
2026-10-08 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 86% of 1428 trade votes
Motions for resolutions - The upcoming EU anti-corruption strategy
2026-10-08 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 98% of 914 rule of law votes
The 2026 undemocratic elections to the Russian State Duma and its implications on civil society
2026-10-08 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 99% of 1047 foreign votes
Predicted stance by topic
- budgetFor 100% of 13
- tradeFor 92% of 12
- digitalFor 91% of 11
- economyFor 80% of 10
- climateFor 100% of 8
- fisheriesFor 63% of 8
- defenceFor 63% of 8
- rule of lawFor 100% of 8
- foreignFor 100% of 7
- healthFor 67% of 6
- transportFor 100% of 6
- agricultureFor 75% of 4
- justiceFor 100% of 4
- employmentFor 100% of 4
- institutionalFor 100% of 4
- energyFor 67% of 3
Votes Tobias missed, how they would likely have voted
EU-Iceland Agreement on the participation of Iceland in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme
2026-09-16
100% of 111 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 80% of the last 20 cast votes
Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland
2026-06-18
98% of 103 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 7 foreign votes · voted For in 80% of the last 20 cast votes
Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba
2026-06-18
93% of 105 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 80% of the last 20 cast votes
Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines
2026-06-18
96% of 104 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 80% of the last 20 cast votes
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles
2026-06-18
100% of 107 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 6 transport votes · voted For in 80% of the last 20 cast votes
Rapporteur files
Files in the 2024–2029 term where Tobias CREMER was appointed to write the Parliament’s report or a committee opinion, or to follow the file for their political group as shadow rapporteur.
Rapporteur · 2
Writes the lead committee's report. Legislative files first, then own-initiative reports.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty
2025/2168(INI) ↗ · AFET · appointed 9 Apr 2025
Tackling barriers to the single market for defence
2025/2143(INI) ↗ · SEDE · appointed 20 Feb 2025
Shadow rapporteur · 4
Follows the lead committee’s report for their political group.
Strategic political relations with Australia – potential for deeper ties in the face of a volatile international order
2026/2034(INI) ↗ · appointed 5 May 2026
2025 Commission report on Georgia
2025/2257(INI) ↗ · appointed 3 Feb 2026
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Georgia
2025/2024(INI) ↗ · appointed 26 Feb 2025
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024
2024/2082(INI) ↗ · appointed 1 Oct 2024
Show more: shadow rapporteur for opinions (2)
Follows another committee’s opinion for their political group.
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities
2025/0555(COD) ↗ · appointed 19 Nov 2025
European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)
2024/0061(COD) ↗ · appointed 19 Mar 2025
Dates are appointment dates. The Parliament’s data doesn’t mark rapporteurs who were later replaced, so a role listed here may have ended; the linked Legislative Observatory (OEIL) file is the authoritative record. Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · data as of 9 Oct 2026 · How we compile this
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€0–0/year
Based on declared income bands
0 declared activities
2 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Events and gifts declared to the Parliament
Self-declared by the MEP, 10th term (since July 2024)
These lists link to declarations Tobias CREMER made to the European Parliament. They are self-declared by the MEP, and the linked EP document is the authoritative record. Having no declarations does not mean having no events: events paid for by EU institutions or bodies, national governments or political parties do not have to be declared, and a declaration can be missing or filed late.
Events paid for by third parties (self-declared)
No event declarations published on the EP website for this term. See Tobias CREMER's declarations on europarl.europa.eu ↗.
Gifts notified to the President (self-declared)
No entries for this MEP in the Parliament's register of gifts ↗ for this term.
Source: European Parliament website (MEP declarations; Register of gifts) · declarations retrieved 30 Sept 2026 · register retrieved 30 Sept 2026. What is listed
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months. These meetings are self-declared by MEPs. Not every MEP publishes meeting declarations, so a missing entry is not evidence that no meeting took place. A disclosed meeting is a recorded contact, not evidence that it influenced a vote.
No lobby meetings recorded for Tobias CREMER in the last 6 months on the EU Transparency Register.
New meetings for Tobias CREMER appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →Parliamentary questions
Written questions to the Commission, the Council and other EU bodies, 10th term (since July 2024)
Written 1 · Priority 1 · 2 co-authored
Latest 2
- 12 Mar 2025Need for a revision of the EU enlargement process and gradual integration of UkrainePriority question P-001053/2025To the Commissionco-authored with 4Answered 20 May 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
- 25 Feb 2025Countering Russian influence and defending democracy in GeorgiaWritten question E-000837/2025To the Vice-President / High Representativeco-authored with 38Answered 3 Apr 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · retrieved from the EP 7 Oct 2026 · newest question tabled 2 Oct 2026. The Parliament publishes a question about one to two weeks after it is tabled, so the newest may not be listed yet. What is counted
About Tobias CREMER
Tobias Cremer is a Member of the European Parliament for Germany, sitting in the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), the centre-left group, and representing the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands. The mandate began on 16 July 2024, in the 10th parliamentary term (2024–2029). Before joining the Parliament, Cremer worked as Desk Officer – Baltic Region, Northern Europe Department, German Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2023–2024), and earlier as Attaché, Diplomatic Training, at the same ministry (2022–2023). Other posts include Lecturer in Political Science, Oxford University (2020–2022), and Member of the executive, Bochum SPD (2024).
Summary grounded in cited sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Germany
More MEPs in Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162: illness, serious family reasons, official mission, or pregnancy and maternity leave, which the Parliament excuses for three months before and six months after a birth) are credited, not counted as absences. We credit only what the Parliament's own record shows: the “excused” list in each sitting's minutes, or leave documented in another official Parliament document. An absence the Parliament has not recorded as excused counts as an absence, even if leave has been reported in the press. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.
Some attendance figures carry a context note, such as maternity or parental leave, illness or an official mission. Each note cites a press or official report, with its source and date, and is reviewed by us before it appears. Context notes never change the attendance figure. MEPs who missed every sitting of an entire plenary session are checked by a person before they appear in any bottom-of-ranking list. Full attendance methodology →
