Attendance by month
EP · roll-call · last 180 daysCredited roll-call participation in each calendar month of the current 180-day window of the 10th term, from the same per-sitting counts as the headline figure. Officially excused sittings (Rule 162) are removed from that month's denominator — a gap in the line is a fully excused month. The dashed line is the mean of ranked MEPs' monthly rates. How this is calculated
Missed votes by sitting
EP · attendance register · last 180 daysEvery plenary sitting day on which this MEP missed at least one roll-call vote, newest first. “Officially excused” means the Parliament's own record excuses the absence; those sittings are already credited in the figure above. Links open the Parliament's record for that day. How this works
- Thu, 22 Oct 2026Missed all 76 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 21 Oct 2026Missed 21 of 152 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 19 Oct 2026Missed all 5 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 8 Oct 2026Missed 4 of 145 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 7 Oct 2026Missed 6 of 54 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 6 Oct 2026Missed 4 of 27 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 5 Oct 2026Missed the 1 voteNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 17 Sept 2026Missed 10 of 124 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 16 Sept 2026Missed 14 of 80 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 15 Sept 2026Missed 14 of 155 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
Show all 27 sitting daysShow fewer
- Mon, 14 Sept 2026Missed the 1 voteNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 9 Jul 2026Missed 7 of 67 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 8 Jul 2026Missed 6 of 144 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 7 Jul 2026Missed 6 of 72 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 6 Jul 2026Missed all 2 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 18 Jun 2026Missed 2 of 77 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 17 Jun 2026Missed 3 of 127 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 16 Jun 2026Missed 2 of 40 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 15 Jun 2026Missed all 2 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 21 May 2026Missed all 98 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 20 May 2026Missed all 96 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 19 May 2026Missed all 3 votesOfficially excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 18 May 2026Missed all 4 votesOfficially excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Thu, 30 Apr 2026Missed all 68 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Wed, 29 Apr 2026Missed 24 of 296 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Tue, 28 Apr 2026Missed 15 of 225 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
- Mon, 27 Apr 2026Missed all 2 votesNot excusedAttendance register ↗Roll-call votes ↗
Voting Record
Main votes over the last 180 days · data as of 22 Oct 2026
Voting against the party line
Share of recorded plenary roll-call votes where Stefan BERGER voted differently from the majority of their European Parliament political group, or of their national-party colleagues.
Different from European People’s Party (EPP) majority
2.2% (4 of 180)
The European People’s Party (EPP) average on the same method is 5.0%. Counted only when Stefan BERGER cast For, Against or Abstain and the group had a unique leading position.
Different from national-party majority
0.6% (1 of 180)
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (Christian Democratic Union) · 23 sitting MEPs. Singleton delegations are excluded.
The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan
Stefan BERGER voted Abstain; 88% of voting European People’s Party (EPP) members (142 of 162) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens, mutagens or reprotoxic substances at work
Stefan BERGER voted Against; 85% of voting European People’s Party (EPP) members (142 of 167) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work
Stefan BERGER voted Against; 77% of voting European People’s Party (EPP) members (130 of 169) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Coordination of social security systems
Stefan BERGER voted Abstain; 77% of voting European People’s Party (EPP) members (134 of 175) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Source: HowTheyVote.eu export of European Parliament roll-call results. This is a count of recorded positions, not a judgment of motive. How this is calculated · Who breaks with their group most often
Vote predictions
Vote modelComputed from Stefan BERGER’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
90% accurate on 5,752 held-out votes
Coming up in plenary, early prediction
EU agri-food promotion policy
2026-11-12 · European People’s Party (EPP) voted For in 76% of 740 agriculture votes
Institutional aspects of artificial intelligence in the context of European integration
2026-11-12 · European People’s Party (EPP) voted For in 98% of 1813 digital votes
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up
2026-11-12 · European People’s Party (EPP) voted For in 62% of 1381 defence votes
Predicted stance by topic
- budgetFor 100% of 13
- climateFor 91% of 11
- tradeFor 91% of 11
- transportFor 90% of 10
- economyFor 100% of 10
- employmentFor 90% of 10
- digitalFor 100% of 9
- foreignFor 100% of 9
- defenceFor 63% of 8
- rule of lawFor 86% of 7
- healthFor 60% of 5
- fisheriesFor 75% of 4
- institutionalFor 100% of 4
- energyFor 100% of 3
- migrationFor 100% of 3
Votes Stefan missed, how they would likely have voted
Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
2026-10-22
100% of 140 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 90% of the last 20 cast votes
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
2026-10-22
94% of 142 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 3 migration votes · voted For in 90% of the last 20 cast votes
Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
2026-10-22
99% of 143 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 90% of the last 20 cast votes
Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
2026-10-22
100% of 142 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 90% of the last 20 cast votes
Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
2026-10-22
97% of 144 European People’s Party (EPP) MEPs voted For · voted For in 90% of the last 20 cast votes
Rapporteur files
Files in the 2024–2029 term where Stefan BERGER was appointed to write the Parliament’s report or a committee opinion, or to follow the file for their political group as shadow rapporteur.
Shadow rapporteur · 3
Follows the lead committee’s report for their political group.
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
2025/2208(INI) ↗ · appointed 18 Nov 2025
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026
2025/2214(INI) ↗ · appointed 10 Nov 2025
Non-financial commercial real estate statistics
2025/0052(COD) ↗ · appointed 10 Sep 2025
Dates are appointment dates. The Parliament’s data doesn’t mark rapporteurs who were later replaced, so a role listed here may have ended; the linked Legislative Observatory (OEIL) file is the authoritative record. Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · data as of 24 Oct 2026 · How we compile this
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€0–0/year
Based on declared income bands
0 declared activities
2 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Events and gifts declared to the Parliament
Self-declared by the MEP, 10th term (since July 2024)
These lists link to declarations Stefan BERGER made to the European Parliament. They are self-declared by the MEP, and the linked EP document is the authoritative record. Having no declarations does not mean having no events: events paid for by EU institutions or bodies, national governments or political parties do not have to be declared, and a declaration can be missing or filed late.
Events paid for by third parties (self-declared)
No event declarations published on the EP website for this term. See Stefan BERGER's declarations on europarl.europa.eu ↗.
Gifts notified to the President (self-declared)
No entries for this MEP in the Parliament's register of gifts ↗ for this term.
Source: European Parliament website (MEP declarations; Register of gifts) · declarations retrieved 30 Sept 2026 · register retrieved 30 Sept 2026. What is listed
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register. These meetings are self-declared by MEPs. Not every MEP publishes meeting declarations, so a missing entry is not evidence that no meeting took place. A disclosed meeting is a recorded contact, not evidence that it influenced a vote.
No lobby meetings recorded for Stefan BERGER on the EU Transparency Register.
Parliamentary questions
Written questions to the Commission, the Council and other EU bodies, 10th term (since July 2024)
Written 2 · Priority 0 · 2 co-authored
Latest 2
- 22 Oct 2024Security-related concerns regarding current EU customs scanning equipment and the Customs Control Equipment Instrument fundsWritten question E-002220/2024To the Commissionco-authored with 10Answered 5 Jan 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
- 19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sectorWritten question E-001770/2024To the Commissionco-authored with 20Answered 17 Dec 2024Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · retrieved from the EP 24 Oct 2026 · newest question tabled 20 Oct 2026. The Parliament publishes a question about one to two weeks after it is tabled, so the newest may not be listed yet. What is counted
About Stefan BERGER
Stefan Berger is a Member of the European Parliament for Germany, belonging to the European People’s Party (EPP), the centre-right group, and to the Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands. Berger's current term is the 10th parliamentary term (2024–2029), which began on 16 July 2024, and Berger also served in the 9th term. Before joining the Parliament, Berger was a Member of the North Rhine-Westphalia Regional Assembly from 2000 to 2019. From 2014 to 2018, Berger was a lecturer in international economic and monetary policy at the Fachhochschule für Oekonomie und Management (FOM) and the International School of Management (ISM). Berger also qualified and practised as a teacher of business studies.
Summary grounded in cited sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Germany
More MEPs in European People’s Party (EPP)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162: illness, serious family reasons, official mission, or pregnancy and maternity leave, which the Parliament excuses for three months before and six months after a birth) are credited, not counted as absences. We credit only what the Parliament's own record shows: the “excused” list in each sitting's minutes, or leave documented in another official Parliament document. An absence the Parliament has not recorded as excused counts as an absence, even if leave has been reported in the press. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.
Some attendance figures carry a context note, such as maternity or parental leave, illness or an official mission. Each note cites a press or official report, with its source and date, and is reviewed by us before it appears. Context notes never change the attendance figure. MEPs who missed every sitting of an entire plenary session are checked by a person before they appear in any bottom-of-ranking list. Full attendance methodology →
