Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
Vote modelComputed from Kristoffer STORM’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes
Implementation into Union law of measures adopted by regional fisheries management organisations
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM): fishing in the GFCM Agreement area
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 68% of 520 transport votes
Predicted stance by topic
EU-Pakistan Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV
2026-06-17
98% of 41 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 50% of 12 trade votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America
2026-06-16
93% of 74 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 50% of 12 trade votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024
2026-03-12
65% of 62 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Abstain · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects
2026-03-12
94% of 62 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029
2026-03-12
95% of 61 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted Against in 75% of 4 climate votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€13,399–14,739/year
Based on declared income bands
0 declared activities
2 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
New meetings for Kristoffer STORM appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Kristoffer STORM
Kristoffer Storm represents Denmark in the European Parliament as a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), a right-wing Eurosceptic political group that advocates for national sovereignty and opposes further European integration. Storm belongs to the Denmark Democrats, the party led by Inger Støjberg that emerged as a significant force in Danish politics following Støjberg's departure from the Liberal Party over immigration policy disagreements. The Denmark Democrats position themselves as a nationalist, anti-immigration party that challenges the European Union's authority over member states. His presence in the ECR group aligns with the party's broader Eurosceptic agenda, contributing to the conservative opposition within the European Parliament's legislative processes.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Denmark
More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.