Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
MEP ProComputed from Adrian-George AXINIA’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes · how this works →
Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 52% of 357 defence votes
Implementation into Union law of measures adopted by regional fisheries management organisations
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM): fishing in the GFCM Agreement area
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
Predicted stance by topic
2025 Commission report on Georgia
2026-06-17
53% of 74 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 77% of 13 foreign votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response
2026-05-20
83% of 64 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 43% of 7 rule of law votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025
2026-04-29
91% of 76 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
EU enlargement strategy
2026-03-11
76% of 76 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Abstain · voted For in 77% of 13 foreign votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law
2026-03-10
75% of 76 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted Against in 50% of 8 economy votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€0–0/year
Based on declared income bands
0 declared activities
1 board membership
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Adrian-George AXINIA's activity for your organisation
WheresMyMEP Pro sends you their new votes the day they land, predicts the ones they miss, and keeps your whole MEP list in one place.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
New meetings for Adrian-George AXINIA appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Adrian-George AXINIA
Adrian-George Axinia represents Romania in the European Parliament as a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), the right-wing Eurosceptic political group that advocates for national sovereignty and opposes further European integration. He belongs to Alianța pentru Unirea Românilor (Alliance for the Unity of Romanians), a nationalist political party that emerged as a significant force in Romanian politics in recent years, promoting traditionalist values and Romanian reunification with Moldova. As part of the ECR group, he operates within a political framework that emphasizes conservative principles, economic liberalism, and skepticism toward centralized EU governance while advocating for a Europe of sovereign nations rather than federal integration.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Romania
More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.