Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
MEP ProComputed from Gerolf ANNEMANS’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes · how this works →
Implementation into Union law of measures adopted by regional fisheries management organisations
2026-09-15 · Patriots for Europe (PfE) voted For in 54% of 448 fisheries votes
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM): fishing in the GFCM Agreement area
2026-09-15 · Patriots for Europe (PfE) voted For in 54% of 448 fisheries votes
Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors
2026-09-15 · Patriots for Europe (PfE) voted For in 73% of 502 transport votes
Predicted stance by topic
EU-Pakistan Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV
2026-06-17
100% of 15 Patriots for Europe (PfE) MEPs voted For · voted Against in 46% of 13 trade votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation
2026-03-26
68% of 75 Patriots for Europe (PfE) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act
2026-03-10
72% of 58 Patriots for Europe (PfE) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies
2026-03-10
69% of 62 Patriots for Europe (PfE) MEPs voted For · voted For in 40% of 5 fisheries votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges
2026-03-10
71% of 63 Patriots for Europe (PfE) MEPs voted Abstain · voted For in 42% of 12 digital votes · voted For in 50% of the last 20 cast votes
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€6,880–7,568/year
Based on declared income bands
1 declared activity
12 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Gerolf ANNEMANS's activity for your organisation
WheresMyMEP Pro sends you their new votes the day they land, predicts the ones they miss, and keeps your whole MEP list in one place.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
No lobby meetings recorded for Gerolf ANNEMANS in the last 6 months on the EU Transparency Register.
New meetings for Gerolf ANNEMANS appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Gerolf ANNEMANS
Gerolf Annemans represents Belgium in the European Parliament as a member of the Patriots for Europe group, the right-wing nationalist formation that advocates for national sovereignty and opposes European federalism. He belongs to Flemish Interest, Belgium's main Flemish nationalist party that campaigns for Flemish independence and restrictive immigration policies. Annemans has served as a prominent figure within Flemish Interest, having previously held leadership positions in the party and serving multiple terms as an MEP since 2014. As part of the Patriots for Europe group, Annemans participates in efforts to promote what the group characterizes as traditional European values while opposing further European integration and supporting stronger national border controls.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Belgium
More MEPs in Patriots for Europe (PfE)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.
