Situation of international law and the risks to multilateralism, democracy and the European Union
- Asser InstituteMember
As of 22 Oct 2026, Thijs REUTEN is a Netherlands MEP in Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D); WheresMyMEP records 92.3% roll-call attendance, 188 notable vote records, 15 disclosed lobby meetings and no paid outside activities declared (data as of 22 Oct 2026).
Cite this: WheresMyMEP, data as of 22 Oct 2026, source European Parliament

Credited roll-call participation in each calendar month of the current 180-day window of the 10th term, from the same per-sitting counts as the headline figure. Officially excused sittings (Rule 162) are removed from that month's denominator — a gap in the line is a fully excused month. The dashed line is the mean of ranked MEPs' monthly rates. How this is calculated
Every plenary sitting day on which this MEP missed at least one roll-call vote, newest first. “Officially excused” means the Parliament's own record excuses the absence; those sittings are already credited in the figure above. Links open the Parliament's record for that day. How this works
Main votes over the last 180 days · data as of 22 Oct 2026
Share of recorded plenary roll-call votes where Thijs REUTEN voted differently from the majority of their European Parliament political group, or of their national-party colleagues.
Different from S&D majority
8.1% (14 of 172)
The S&D average on the same method is 5.1%. Counted only when Thijs REUTEN cast For, Against or Abstain and the group had a unique leading position.
Different from national-party majority
0.0% (0 of 170)
Netherlands - PRO Europa · 8 sitting MEPs. Singleton delegations are excluded.
EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement
Thijs REUTEN voted Abstain; 96% of voting S&D members (112 of 117) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
Thijs REUTEN voted Abstain; 95% of voting S&D members (107 of 113) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗United Nations Convention against Cybercrime
Thijs REUTEN voted Abstain; 94% of voting S&D members (101 of 107) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain
Thijs REUTEN voted Against; 91% of voting S&D members (119 of 131) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
Thijs REUTEN voted Abstain; 90% of voting S&D members (106 of 118) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security
Thijs REUTEN voted Against; 89% of voting S&D members (102 of 115) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods
Thijs REUTEN voted Against; 86% of voting S&D members (110 of 128) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins
Thijs REUTEN voted Abstain; 81% of voting S&D members (98 of 121) voted For.
EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗Source: HowTheyVote.eu export of European Parliament roll-call results. This is a count of recorded positions, not a judgment of motive. How this is calculated · Who breaks with their group most often
Computed from Thijs REUTEN’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
90% accurate on 5,744 held-out votes
EU agri-food promotion policy
2026-11-12 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 70% of 366 agriculture votes
Institutional aspects of artificial intelligence in the context of European integration
2026-11-12 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 91% of 843 digital votes
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up
2026-11-12 · Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) voted For in 61% of 997 defence votes
Escalation of Russian strikes in the EU, particularly on Black Sea shipping, threatening human life, regional stability and food security
2026-10-22
95% of 111 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 95% of the last 20 cast votes
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross‑border cooperation
2026-10-22
94% of 112 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 95% of the last 20 cast votes
Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
2026-10-22
98% of 111 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 95% of the last 20 cast votes
Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030
2026-10-22
97% of 110 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted Against · voted For in 95% of the last 20 cast votes
Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products
2026-10-22
95% of 111 Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) MEPs voted For · voted For in 95% of the last 20 cast votes
Files in the 2024–2029 term where Thijs REUTEN was appointed to write the Parliament’s report or a committee opinion, or to follow the file for their political group as shadow rapporteur.
Writes the lead committee's report. Legislative files first, then own-initiative reports.
Conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in respect of Gibraltar between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part
2026/0058(NLE) ↗ · AFET · appointed 18 Mar 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025
2025/2165(INI) ↗ · SEDE · appointed 9 Jul 2025
Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
2024/2108(INI) ↗ · AFET · appointed 18 Nov 2024
Writes another committee's opinion for the lead committee.
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan
2025/0103(COD) ↗ · SEDE · appointed 15 May 2025
Follows the lead committee’s report for their political group.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2026
2026/2058(INI) ↗ · appointed 3 Sep 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence Union
2025/2212(INI) ↗ · appointed 3 Sep 2026
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on North Macedonia
2025/2021(INI) ↗ · appointed 4 Dec 2024
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters
2024/0167(NLE) ↗ · appointed 21 Nov 2024
2025 Commission report on Ukraine
2025/2259(INI) ↗ · appointed 14 Nov 2024
2025 Commission report on North Macedonia
2025/2254(INI) ↗ · appointed 14 Nov 2024
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Ukraine
2025/2026(INI) ↗ · appointed 14 Nov 2024
Enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings, and on enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimes and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794
2023/0438(COD) ↗ · appointed 30 Sep 2024
Dates are appointment dates. The Parliament’s data doesn’t mark rapporteurs who were later replaced, so a role listed here may have ended; the linked Legislative Observatory (OEIL) file is the authoritative record. Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · data as of 31 Oct 2026 · How we compile this
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
No paid outside activities declared.
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Self-declared by the MEP, 10th term (since July 2024)
These lists link to declarations Thijs REUTEN made to the European Parliament. They are self-declared by the MEP, and the linked EP document is the authoritative record. Having no declarations does not mean having no events: events paid for by EU institutions or bodies, national governments or political parties do not have to be declared, and a declaration can be missing or filed late.
No event declarations published on the EP website for this term. See Thijs REUTEN's declarations on europarl.europa.eu ↗.
No entries for this MEP in the Parliament's register of gifts ↗ for this term.
Source: European Parliament website (MEP declarations; Register of gifts) · declarations retrieved 30 Sept 2026 · register retrieved 30 Sept 2026. What is listed
Most recent meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register. These meetings are self-declared by MEPs. Not every MEP publishes meeting declarations, so a missing entry is not evidence that no meeting took place. A disclosed meeting is a recorded contact, not evidence that it influenced a vote.
Declared meetings that name a file, the recorded role on that file, and the plenary roll-call, in date order.
1 meeting on 1 file
These meetings are self-declared by MEPs. Not every MEP publishes meeting declarations, so a missing entry is not evidence that no meeting took place. A disclosed meeting is a recorded contact, not evidence that it influenced a vote.
Source: European Parliament meeting declarations · EU Transparency Register · HowTheyVote.eu / EP roll-call · EP Open Data Portal (roles) · How we match meetings to files
Written questions to the Commission, the Council and other EU bodies, 10th term (since July 2024)
Written 36 · Priority 6 · 41 co-authored
Not in this count: 1 oral question
Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · retrieved from the EP 31 Oct 2026 · newest question tabled 26 Oct 2026. The Parliament publishes a question about one to two weeks after it is tabled, so the newest may not be listed yet. What is counted
Thijs Reuten is a Member of the European Parliament for the Netherlands, sitting with the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), the centre-left group, and representing the national party Progressief Nederland. The current term is the 10th parliamentary term (2024–2029), which began on 16 July 2024, and Reuten also served in the 9th parliamentary term. Before joining the Parliament, Reuten was Head of Policy at the Global Reporting Initiative (2020–2021). Earlier posts include District councillor, Amsterdam-East (2010–2018), Municipal councillor, Amsterdam (2002–2008), and Policy officer in the field of foreign policy and defence for the PvdA group in the House of Representatives (2001–2006).
Summary grounded in cited sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162: illness, serious family reasons, official mission, or pregnancy and maternity leave, which the Parliament excuses for three months before and six months after a birth) are credited, not counted as absences. We credit only what the Parliament's own record shows: the “excused” list in each sitting's minutes, or leave documented in another official Parliament document. An absence the Parliament has not recorded as excused counts as an absence, even if leave has been reported in the press. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.
Some attendance figures carry a context note, such as maternity or parental leave, illness or an official mission. Each note cites a press or official report, with its source and date, and is reviewed by us before it appears. Context notes never change the attendance figure. MEPs who missed every sitting of an entire plenary session are checked by a person before they appear in any bottom-of-ranking list. Full attendance methodology →