Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
MEP ProComputed from Jacek OZDOBA’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes · how this works →
Implementation into Union law of measures adopted by regional fisheries management organisations
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM): fishing in the GFCM Agreement area
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 68% of 520 transport votes
Predicted stance by topic
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
2026-07-07
63% of 68 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 42% of 12 digital votes · voted For in 65% of the last 20 cast votes
2025 Commission report on Türkiye
2026-06-17
88% of 78 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Abstain · voted For in 65% of the last 20 cast votes
Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values
2026-06-16
73% of 80 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted Abstain · voted For in 57% of 7 rule of law votes · voted For in 65% of the last 20 cast votes
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver
2026-06-16
83% of 80 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 71% of 7 employment votes · voted For in 65% of the last 20 cast votes
Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel
2026-06-16
93% of 80 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 100% of 3 institutional votes · voted For in 65% of the last 20 cast votes
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
Estimated outside income
€4,192–4,611/year
Based on declared income bands
1 declared activity
0 board memberships
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Jacek OZDOBA's activity for your organisation
WheresMyMEP Pro sends you their new votes the day they land, predicts the ones they miss, and keeps your whole MEP list in one place.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
New meetings for Jacek OZDOBA appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Jacek OZDOBA
Jacek Ozdoba represents Poland in the European Parliament as a member of Polska Razem, a right-wing political party that emerged from Poland's broader conservative movement. He sits with the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), a Eurosceptic political group that advocates for national sovereignty, traditional values, and reform of EU institutions rather than deeper European integration. Serving a full term rather than joining mid-session, Ozdoba contributes to the ECR's efforts to provide conservative opposition within the European legislative process. His presence reflects Poland's significant Eurosceptic constituency and the ongoing tensions between national conservative movements and European federalist ambitions within the Parliament's political dynamics.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Poland
More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.