Voting Record
Notable votes in the current parliamentary term
Vote predictions
MEP ProComputed from Waldemar BUDA’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.
84% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes · how this works →
Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 52% of 357 defence votes
Implementation into Union law of measures adopted by regional fisheries management organisations
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM): fishing in the GFCM Agreement area
2026-09-15 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 94% of 457 fisheries votes
Predicted stance by topic
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87705
2026-07-08
82% of 72 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
2026-07-07
63% of 68 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 45% of 11 digital votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Competition policy – annual report 2025
2026-07-07
60% of 75 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted Against in 71% of 7 economy votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland
2026-06-18
92% of 59 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 64% of 11 foreign votes · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba
2026-06-18
98% of 65 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 60% of the last 20 cast votes
Financial Declarations
Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP
No current outside activities or board memberships declared.
Previous occupations
Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026
View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →Track Waldemar BUDA's activity for your organisation
WheresMyMEP Pro sends you their new votes the day they land, predicts the ones they miss, and keeps your whole MEP list in one place.
Recent Lobby Meetings
Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months
New meetings for Waldemar BUDA appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?
Meeting alerts →About Waldemar BUDA
Waldemar Buda represents Poland in the European Parliament as a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), the right-wing Eurosceptic grouping that advocates for national sovereignty and opposes further European integration. He belongs to Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość), Poland's conservative ruling party that has frequently clashed with EU institutions over judicial reforms and rule of law issues. Buda previously served as Poland's Deputy Minister of Development and Technology, bringing government experience to his European parliamentary role. His position within both the ECR group and Law and Justice aligns him with efforts to resist what these groups view as excessive EU centralization while promoting traditional conservative values and Polish national interests within the European framework.
AI-generated summary · Verify with official EP sources
View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →More MEPs from Poland
More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
Methodology
Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162, illness, family, official mission, or maternity) are credited, not counted as absences. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.