← Back to Home

Maciej WĄSIK is a Poland MEP in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR); WheresMyMEP records 98.1% roll-call attendance, 194 notable vote records, 0 recent disclosed lobby meetings and no current outside activities or board memberships declared. Source: European Parliament profile, European Parliament Open Data, MEP meeting declarations and financial-interest declarations.

Maciej WĄSIK

🇵🇱

ECR · Poland

Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (Law and Justice)

98.1% attendance
View official EP profile →
98.1%
Attendance · last 180 days
#191 of 715 on the leaderboard
1678
Votes Participated
10th Term
2024 – 2029

Attendance by month

EP · roll-call · last 180 days

Credited roll-call participation in each calendar month of the current 180-day window of the 10th term, from the same per-sitting counts as the headline figure. Officially excused sittings (Rule 162) are removed from that month's denominator — a gap in the line is a fully excused month. The dashed line is the mean of ranked MEPs' monthly rates. How this is calculated

Maciej WĄSIK monthly attendance compared with the EU mean025507510098.0%98.0%98.8%98.9%97.2%96.4%Apr ’26May ’26Jun ’26Jul ’26Sept ’26Oct ’26

Missed votes by sitting

EP · attendance register · last 180 days

Every plenary sitting day on which this MEP missed at least one roll-call vote, newest first. “Officially excused” means the Parliament's own record excuses the absence; those sittings are already credited in the figure above. Links open the Parliament's record for that day. How this works

Show all 14 sitting days

Voting Record

Main votes over the last 180 days · data as of 6 Oct 2026

Download CSV →

Voting against the party line

Share of recorded plenary roll-call votes where Maciej WĄSIK voted differently from the majority of their European Parliament political group, or of their national-party colleagues.

EP roll-call · HowTheyVote.eu

Different from ECR majority

22.2% (42 of 189)

The ECR average on the same method is 17.1%. Counted only when Maciej WĄSIK cast For, Against or Abstain and the group had a unique leading position.

Different from national-party majority

9.0% (17 of 188)

Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (Law and Justice) · 20 sitting MEPs. Singleton delegations are excluded.

Largest breaks from the group majority
6 Oct 2026

The EU’s approach to corporate tax policy in a changing international environment

Maciej WĄSIK voted Against; 86% of voting ECR members (61 of 71) voted Abstain.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Against
29 Apr 2026

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament

Maciej WĄSIK voted Against; 84% of voting ECR members (70 of 83) voted Abstain.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Against
30 Apr 2026

New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities

Maciej WĄSIK voted Against; 83% of voting ECR members (59 of 71) voted For.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Against
17 Sept 2026

An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector

Maciej WĄSIK voted Abstain; 82% of voting ECR members (59 of 72) voted For.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Abstain
17 Jun 2026

2025 Commission report on Montenegro

Maciej WĄSIK voted Abstain; 80% of voting ECR members (63 of 79) voted For.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Abstain
17 Jun 2026

European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level

Maciej WĄSIK voted Abstain; 78% of voting ECR members (62 of 80) voted For.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Abstain
7 Jul 2026

Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025

Maciej WĄSIK voted Against; 76% of voting ECR members (55 of 72) voted For.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Against
15 Sept 2026

Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure

Maciej WĄSIK voted Against; 76% of voting ECR members (59 of 78) voted Abstain.

EP roll-call results ↗via HowTheyVote.eu ↗
Against

Source: HowTheyVote.eu export of European Parliament roll-call results. This is a count of recorded positions, not a judgment of motive. How this is calculated · Who breaks with their group most often

Vote predictions

Vote model

Computed from Maciej WĄSIK’s own roll-call record and how their group actually voted, rules, not guesswork.

87% accurate on 5,728 held-out votes

Coming up in plenary, early prediction

Motions for resolutions - The state of play of advancing EU-Africa trade and investment relations

2026-10-08 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 61% of 894 trade votes

For likely

The 2026 undemocratic elections to the Russian State Duma and its implications on civil society

2026-10-08 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 72% of 648 foreign votes

For likely

Attempts by the ruling party Georgian Dream to ban opposition parties in Georgia

2026-10-08 · European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) voted For in 72% of 648 foreign votes

For likely

Predicted stance by topic

  • budgetAgainst 54% of 13
  • digitalFor 55% of 11
  • tradeFor 40% of 10
  • economyAgainst 50% of 10
  • climateFor 33% of 9
  • foreignFor 78% of 9
  • fisheriesFor 88% of 8
  • transportFor 63% of 8
  • defenceFor 50% of 8
  • rule of lawAgainst 63% of 8
  • healthAgainst 50% of 6
  • justiceFor 75% of 4
  • employmentFor 75% of 4
  • institutionalFor 100% of 4
  • energyFor 100% of 3
  • agricultureFor 67% of 3

Votes Maciej missed, how they would likely have voted

EU-Norway Agreement on the participation of Norway in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme

2026-09-16

For · 95%

100% of 72 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 55% of the last 20 cast votes

Temporary trade-liberalisation measures applicable to Armenian products

2026-09-15

For · 95%

92% of 75 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 40% of 10 trade votes · voted For in 55% of the last 20 cast votes

EU-Pakistan Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV

2026-06-17

For · 95%

98% of 41 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 40% of 10 trade votes · voted For in 55% of the last 20 cast votes

Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain

2026-06-16

For · 95%

99% of 78 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 67% of 3 agriculture votes · voted For in 55% of the last 20 cast votes

EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement

2026-05-20

For · 95%

87% of 77 European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) MEPs voted For · voted For in 55% of the last 20 cast votes

Rapporteur files

Files in the 2024–2029 term where Maciej WĄSIK was appointed to write the Parliament’s report or a committee opinion, or to follow the file for their political group as shadow rapporteur.

Show more: shadow rapporteur for opinions (1)

Follows another committee’s opinion for their political group.

  • Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

    2025/2061(INI) ↗ · appointed 21 May 2025

Dates are appointment dates. The Parliament’s data doesn’t mark rapporteurs who were later replaced, so a role listed here may have ended; the linked Legislative Observatory (OEIL) file is the authoritative record. Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · data as of 9 Oct 2026 · How we compile this

Financial Declarations

Declared to the European Parliament · Self-reported by the MEP

No current outside activities or board memberships declared.

Previous occupations

Member of Parliament and Secretary of State

Source: European Parliament declarations · Self-reported · Last updated: 23 Mar 2026

View original declaration on europarl.europa.eu →

Events and gifts declared to the Parliament

Self-declared by the MEP, 10th term (since July 2024)

EP · self-declared · weekly

These lists link to declarations Maciej WĄSIK made to the European Parliament. They are self-declared by the MEP, and the linked EP document is the authoritative record. Having no declarations does not mean having no events: events paid for by EU institutions or bodies, national governments or political parties do not have to be declared, and a declaration can be missing or filed late.

Events paid for by third parties (self-declared)

Gifts notified to the President (self-declared)

No entries for this MEP in the Parliament's register of gifts ↗ for this term.

All filings: Maciej WĄSIK's declarations on europarl.europa.eu ↗

Source: European Parliament website (MEP declarations; Register of gifts) · declarations retrieved 30 Sept 2026 · register retrieved 30 Sept 2026. What is listed

Recent Lobby Meetings

Meetings disclosed on the EU Transparency Register, last 6 months. These meetings are self-declared by MEPs. Not every MEP publishes meeting declarations, so a missing entry is not evidence that no meeting took place. A disclosed meeting is a recorded contact, not evidence that it influenced a vote.

EU Transparency Register · Updated weekly

No lobby meetings recorded for Maciej WĄSIK in the last 6 months on the EU Transparency Register.

New meetings for Maciej WĄSIK appear here when disclosed. Want them in your inbox the day they land, for any MEP, organisation or EU file?

Meeting alerts →

Parliamentary questions

Written questions to the Commission, the Council and other EU bodies, 10th term (since July 2024)

EP · open data · updated daily
30written and priority questions as author or co-author

Written 25 · Priority 5 · 7 co-authored

Not in this count: 1 interpellation

Latest 10

  • 4 Sept 2026EU financing of Poland’s 2023 change of governmentWritten question E-003501/2026To the CommissionAwaiting answerQuestion ↗PDF ↗
  • 4 Sept 2026Poland shut out of measures and investments under the European semiconductor strategyWritten question E-003500/2026To the CommissionAwaiting answerQuestion ↗PDF ↗
  • 29 Apr 2026DT Global’s implementation of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (NDICI – Global Europe) programmeWritten question E-001757/2026To the CommissionAwaiting answerQuestion ↗PDF ↗
  • 29 Apr 2026DT Global contracts with the Commission between 2018 and 2025Written question E-001756/2026To the CommissionAnswered 3 Aug 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 13 Apr 2026The Commission’s position on HuaweiWritten question E-001490/2026To the CommissionAnswered 5 Jun 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 26 Mar 2026State of play of the Rail Baltica projectWritten question E-001278/2026To the CommissionAnswered 19 May 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 18 Mar 2026Removal of Niels Troost from the EU sanctions listWritten question E-001144/2026To the CouncilAnswered 4 Jun 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 18 Mar 2026Implementation of the SAFE programme in PolandWritten question E-001143/2026To the CommissionAnswered 26 May 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 11 Mar 2026Availability of the list of Commission partners providing support to independent Belarusian mediaWritten question E-001014/2026To the CommissionAnswered 13 May 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 21 Jan 2026Bypassing of Parliament in the EU-Mercosur free trade agreement ratification processPriority question P-000226/2026To the CommissionAnswered 23 Feb 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
Show all 30 questions
  • 21 Jan 2026Legality and competitiveness of UZ Cargo Polska’s operations on the EU marketWritten question E-000225/2026To the CommissionAnswered 31 Mar 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 17 Dec 2025Corruption scandal and detentions in the European External Action Service and the College of Europe in BrugesWritten question E-004996/2025To the Vice-President / High RepresentativeAnswered 7 Apr 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 10 Nov 2025Charges against former Commissioner for Justice for money laundering and his ties to sanctioned oligarch Oleg DeripaskaPriority question P-004435/2025To the Commissionco-authored with 1Answered 5 Feb 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 6 Oct 2025DT Global Europe as a beneficiary of the EU4 Independent Media programmeWritten question E-003913/2025To the CommissionAnswered 28 Jan 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 9 Sept 2025Commission financing of independent Belarusian media and journalistsWritten question E-003495/2025To the Commissionco-authored with 2Answered 17 Feb 2026Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 28 Aug 2025Allocation by the Commission of an additional EUR 3 billion to EU Member States providing assistance to Ukrainian nationals since 2022Written question E-003321/2025To the CommissionAnswered 16 Dec 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 12 Mar 2025Concerns about the Commission’s neutrality in elections, given past cases of perceived interference amid Commissioner Virkkunen’s recent statementWritten question E-001060/2025To the Commissionco-authored with 25Answered 26 Jun 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 6 Mar 2025Threat of illegal interference by the Commission in the 2025 Polish presidential electionsPriority question P-000969/2025To the CommissionAnswered 7 May 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 26 Feb 2025The need to amend the Schengen Visa Code to prevent Russian war criminals from entering the EU.Written question E-000860/2025To the Commissionco-authored with 1Answered 16 May 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 14 Feb 2025Commission position on the Polish Government’s declaration that Poland will not participate in the implementation of the Pact on Migration and AsylumPriority question P-000699/2025To the CommissionAnswered 26 May 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 22 Jan 2025Clean Industrial DealWritten question E-000279/2025To the CommissionAnswered 23 Apr 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 17 Dec 2024Human rights violations by the Cuban regime in the light of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and CubaWritten question E-002998/2024To the Vice-President / High Representativeco-authored with 1Answered 17 Mar 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 13 Nov 2024Pact on Migration and Asylum – fair burden sharingWritten question E-002507/2024To the CommissionAnswered 17 Jan 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 5 Nov 2024Excessive deficit procedure for PolandWritten question E-002415/2024To the CommissionAnswered 20 Jan 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 10 Sept 2024Ineffectiveness of readmissions in the EUWritten question E-001673/2024To the CommissionAnswered 24 Jan 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 10 Sept 2024Violation of the principle of media freedom in Poland in respect of ‘Anita Gargas’ Investigative Magazine’Written question E-001672/2024To the CommissionAnswered 25 Nov 2024Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 10 Sept 2024Violation of the rule of law by the Polish Government of Donald Tusk as exemplified by the municipality of SupraślWritten question E-001671/2024To the CommissionAnswered 30 Oct 2024Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 6 Sept 2024Violation of the principle of media freedom and pluralism by the government of Donald Tusk in Poland in relation to Telewizja RepublikaWritten question E-001643/2024To the CommissionAnswered 9 Apr 2025Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 19 Aug 2024EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriersPriority question P-001520/2024To the Commissionco-authored with 24Answered 1 Oct 2024Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
  • 29 Jul 2024The financing of terrorist organisations through migrant smuggling under the hybrid regimes in Moscow and MinskWritten question E-001451/2024To the Commissionco-authored with 1Answered 11 Dec 2024Question ↗PDF ↗Answer ↗Answer PDF ↗
Show the 1 interpellation
  • 20 Sept 2024EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriers at the external borderInterpellation G-001002/2024To the Commissionco-authored with 29Awaiting answerQuestion ↗PDF ↗

Source: European Parliament Open Data Portal · CC BY 4.0 · retrieved from the EP 7 Oct 2026 · newest question tabled 2 Oct 2026. The Parliament publishes a question about one to two weeks after it is tabled, so the newest may not be listed yet. What is counted

About Maciej WĄSIK

Maciej Wąsik is a Member of the European Parliament for Poland, in the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group, the right-wing Eurosceptic group, and represents the national party Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. Wąsik has served in the 10th parliamentary term (2024–2029) since 16 July 2024.

Summary grounded in cited sources

View official profile on europarl.europa.eu →

More MEPs in European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)

Methodology

Attendance is calculated based on roll-call votes in plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Committee votes are excluded. Abstaining counts as present; not voting counts as absent. Sittings for which the Parliament officially excused a Member (Rule 162: illness, serious family reasons, official mission, or pregnancy and maternity leave, which the Parliament excuses for three months before and six months after a birth) are credited, not counted as absences. We credit only what the Parliament's own record shows: the “excused” list in each sitting's minutes, or leave documented in another official Parliament document. An absence the Parliament has not recorded as excused counts as an absence, even if leave has been reported in the press. Notable votes are selected based on significance, close outcomes, and high participation.

Some attendance figures carry a context note, such as maternity or parental leave, illness or an official mission. Each note cites a press or official report, with its source and date, and is reviewed by us before it appears. Context notes never change the attendance figure. MEPs who missed every sitting of an entire plenary session are checked by a person before they appear in any bottom-of-ranking list. Full attendance methodology →

Work in EU policy?

Get an AI colleague that follows the legislative files your team cares about and brings important changes directly into Slack.